入门 Clarity Act collapse shifts crypto oversight to SEC and CFTC
Quick answer
The Clarity Act’s failure in late September 2026 removed the last near-term legislative path for defining digital asset classifications and assigning clear regulatory jurisdiction. Its collapse leaves the SEC and CFTC as de facto rulemakers — without statutory authority to define ‘security’ or ‘commodity’ in crypto contexts, and without Congress-mandated coordination mechanisms. Market participants now face enforcement-first regulation: 73% of active token projects launched since January 2025 have received at least one informal SEC inquiry (Decrypt, 2026-09-20), while CFTC enforcement actions against derivatives platforms rose 41% YoY through Q2 2026.
What actually happened — and what the vote data shows
The Clarity Act — formally titled the Crypto Asset Regulatory Certainty and Transparency Act — failed a procedural vote in the U.S. Senate on September 18, 2026. It did not reach final passage; no roll-call vote occurred. The bill had cleared the House Financial Services Committee in June 2026 with bipartisan support but stalled after Senate Banking Committee leadership declined to schedule markup. According to Decrypt’s reporting, fewer than 12 Senators publicly endorsed bringing it to floor debate before adjournment (Decrypt, 2026-09-20). No official vote tally, amendment log, or committee report was published — meaning the legislative record contains no formal rationale, no cost estimate, and no jurisdictional mapping between asset types and agencies.
Who bears the impact — and how it varies across asset classes
Stablecoins face immediate pressure: the Act would have exempted USD-pegged tokens meeting reserve and redemption criteria from securities registration. Without it, the SEC continues treating stablecoin issuers like Paxos and Circle as ‘investment contracts’ under Howey — despite no court ruling affirming that classification for non-yielding stablecoins (SEC v. Ripple, 2023, excluded USDC). For tokens with utility functions — such as those powering decentralized compute networks or storage protocols — enforcement risk has spiked. Since March 2026, the SEC has issued 19 Wells Notices to protocol treasuries holding native tokens, citing ‘unregistered distribution’ — even where tokens were distributed via airdrops with no fundraising element (Decrypt, 2026-09-20). Meanwhile, CFTC oversight now dominates futures, options, and leveraged spot markets: 87% of BTC and ETH perpetual swaps traded on U.S.-accessible platforms fall under CFTC-regulated entities, per CoinGecko’s 2026 Q2 derivatives survey.
What remains unresolved — and why enforcement volatility is rising
No statutory definition of ‘digital commodity’ exists in U.S. law. The CFTC’s 2023 guidance — which classified BTC and ETH as commodities — carries no force of law and has never been tested in appellate court. Similarly, the SEC’s reliance on the Howey test for tokens lacks codified thresholds: its 2024 Framework Update introduced no quantitative metrics for ‘common enterprise’ or ‘expectation of profit’, leaving interpretation entirely to enforcement staff. As Decrypt notes, this vacuum incentivizes reactive action — not rulemaking. Between April and August 2026, the SEC filed six new enforcement complaints targeting token issuers, all naming ‘decentralization’ as a contested legal fact rather than an established status (Decrypt, 2026-09-20). That trend correlates with a 300% increase in subpoena requests to on-chain analytics firms, per Chainalysis’ 2026 Enforcement Transparency Report.
常见问题
Why didn’t the Clarity Act pass — and is there a replacement bill?
No public explanation was issued by Senate leadership. As of September 20, 2026, no successor bill has been introduced in either chamber. The House Financial Services Committee has signaled no intent to refile before the 2026 midterms, per committee staff briefing notes cited by Decrypt.
Does this mean all tokens are now securities?
No. The SEC has not declared all tokens securities. It maintains that classification depends on facts and circumstances — but has not published updated criteria since its 2019 Framework. Courts remain split: the Southern District of New York upheld the SEC’s claim against LBRY (2022), while the same court rejected it against XRP (2023) on factual grounds — a decision the SEC has not appealed.
风险提示与免责声明
Digital asset regulations remain fluid and subject to change without notice. This article reports on legislative developments and enforcement trends as documented by Decrypt on September 20, 2026. It does not constitute legal, tax, or investment advice. Cryptodlhub receives referral fees when readers access third-party services via /go/binance-download/. We do not endorse any exchange, nor do we guarantee compatibility with your jurisdiction. Official domain names — such as binance.com — are referenced for identification only. For foundational concepts, see our Glossary and news archive.
Risk warning and disclosure
Some outbound links may be affiliate links and we may earn a commission. This article is independent third-party information, not an official publication, and is not investment advice.
Related News
入门 ASI Alliance FET Token Migration and Cross-Chain Infrastructure Compromised
Attackers exploited ASI Alliance’s FET token migration and cross-chain infrastructure on September 20, 2026, stealing approximately $1.56 million worth of…
入门 Grayscale files 3-for-1 forward split for proposed Zcash ETF
Grayscale has submitted a 3-for-1 forward stock split proposal to the SEC as part of its pending Zcash (ZEC) spot ETF application. This is a procedural st…
入门 Kalshi and Kraken’s Parent Firm Seek U.S. Approval for Equity-Linked Perpetual Contracts
Kalshi Exchange and Payward — Kraken’s parent company — jointly filed with the CFTC and SEC to list cash-settled perpetual futures tied to U.S. equities.…
Follow the market on a major exchange
Download Binance or OKX from the official website to start trading.